Christian Rabbis or Kabala for Christians

kaballah mashiach  |  Christian Rabbis or Kabala for Christians

The Sage Hillel formulated a negative form of the golden rule. When asked to sum up the entire Torah concisely, he answered: That which is hateful to you, do not do to your fellow. That is the whole Torah; the rest is the explanation; go and learn. —Talmud, Shabbat 31a, the "Great Principle"

Let me just start by saying I am not writing this to argue with or make fun of Christians, but that I love and respect Christians very much.  I also believe that the Torah is the inspired word and must be our first source of study.

The purpose of this is to inform those Christians which speak against the Oral Law, The Talmud or any other rabbinic writings.

The "Golden Rule" has been attributed to Yeshua: "Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do you even so to them" (Matthew 7:12, see also Luke 6:31).

The common English phrasing is "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you Christianity adopted the golden rule from two edicts, found in Leviticus 19:18 ("Do not seek revenge or bear a grudge against one of your people, but love your neighbor as yourself"; and Leviticus 19:34 ("But the stranger that dwells with you shall be unto you as one born among you, and thou shall love him as thyself; for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the LORD your God"). Leviticus 19:34 universalizes the edict of Leviticus 19:18 from "one of your people" to all of humankind.

The Old Testament Deuterocanonical books of Tobit and Sirach, accepted as part of the Scriptural canon by Catholic Church, Eastern Orthodoxy, and the Non-Chalcedonian Churches, also express a negative form of the golden rule: "Do to no one what you yourself dislike."  —Tobit 4:15

At the time of Hillel, an elder contemporary of Yeshua, the negative form of the golden rule already must have been proverbial, because of the accordance with Tobit 4:15. When asked to sum up the entire Torah concisely, he answered: "That which is hateful to you, do not do to your fellow. That is the whole Torah; the rest is the explanation; go and learn." —Talmud, Shabbat 31a

"Recognize that your neighbor feels as you do, and keep in mind your own dislikes." —Sirach 31:15

There is also much debate in the Christian scriptures.  Some doubt the validity of certain books while others do not.  There are books mentioned in the Bible such as Enoch and Jubilees which are not part of the Cannon. Why? How about the ending of the Book of Mark?  Some versions only go up to verse eight, while other versions add verses nine to sixteen.  So which is right?  

The truth is there is much to learn from rabbinic writings.  I know that many Christians will say that they believe the bible and nothing else.  This may be true, but Christianity has its own form of Rabbis called the Church fathers.  The names like Calvin, Wesley and Luther are part of the reason that there are so many Christian denominations because each man had his own interpretation of scripture.

Many of the founding fathers were very anti-Semitic.  This is especially true of Luther whose quotes inspired Hitler, in part, to write Mein Kampf.

Another issue is that of Kabbalah.  There are two types of Kabala.  There is Hollywood or Madonna Cabala as I like to call it, or true Kabala. 

The word Kabala comes from the Hebrew verb lekabbel, which means “to receive” or “to accept”.  This means that anything that is received or accepted such as the Bible, salvation or even the Messiah is Kabala.

The fact is that the main source of our belief must come from the Bible, but let us not be so quick to dismiss the writings of our sages who have much to offer us.  Now, do I agree with everything in Talmud?  No!!  But we also don’t agree with every interpretation of the Bible, that doesn’t mean we reject it.

1607a25bb14ac3d79405ea27610a9919

Like What You've Read? Help expand our great Messianic Jewish content for the whole world to use. Please donate and learn more about tzedakah and tithing (maaser), and learn to give and be blessed.

« Do not follow your heart!
What does the Hebrew title Maran means? »

bethaderech

‍‍November 28th, 2011 - 2 Kislev 5772 at 11:05 pm    

seeker

BS\”D

Shalom Gamaliel, basicamente se sabe que hay textos en las Buenas Nuevas que fueron añadidos despues, muchas veses para arreglar su doctrina, etc… Uno bueno es como Santiago nunca se cambia de regreso, puesto que su nombre no era Santiago, si no Yacov o Jacobo. Pero como no querian a la gente de las Buenas Nuevas Judias (exepto los malos dique), entonces se los cambiaban, aunque hubiera otra persona en las Escrituras llamas por el mismo nombre, como el padre de las 12 tribus, Jacobo o Yacov.

Cibeles

‍‍February 21st, 2013 - 22 Shevat 5773 at 3:34 pm    

seeker

I am Jewish and believe ONLY in Judaism while believing that Yeshua is the rightful Jewish Messiah.
I agree with 97% of what your Congregation teaches on your site (and as such I support your work and will continue to do so), but I am greatly saddened to see just a few people of your Congregation writing about, or subtly mentioning kabbalah.
I understand that this has spread throughout the Jewish world since the Middle Ages, and I feel that it is the sole high place within Judaism which has to be taken down.

Despite statements to the contrary, kabbalah dates back to the Middle Ages, none of the Biblical prophets, nor the Messiah, nor his talmidim believed in kabbalah. That is why the the book used by the kabbalists was written by a Spanish Jew during the Middle Ages.
This book first appeared in Spain during the 1200's, before that it did not exist.
The traditional claim made by kabbalists that kabbalah is the concealed part of the Oral Law is false and is based on the lie which Moses De Leon (the Medieval author of the book) propagated, when he stated that the author of the book (which he himself had written) was the Rabbi Shimon Bar Yochai .
After his death De Leon's widow confessed that her husband was the author of the work, and had placed his doctrine in the mouth of a long dead Rabbi from the 2nd Century because he thought that it would be a rich source of profit. So the beginning of kabbalah was based on false perceptions.

Christianity has MANY high places which have to be taken down (idolatry, pagan holidays, a multitude of pagan concepts such as the trinity, willfully not following G-D's Torah,etc.),
whereas kabbalah is the one high place in Judaism, which likewise has to be taken down.
Regardless of the Hebrew etymology of the word, what it has come to represent, as well as some of the concepts taught by it, are erroneous and contrary to Torah.
The word "Zohar" appears in the vision of Ezekiel Chapter 8 Verse 2 and is usually translated as meaning radiance or light, yet that does not mean that the book titled Zohar emanates the light of the Torah, just because of the word's meaning.

The things is that I do not believe in kabbalah.
So please, my esteemed Jewish brethren, consider what this promotes and how the Messiah would have disapproved of it .
You do such good and important work for the Glory of G-D, so do not allow mentions of kabbalah to ruin it. If it were not for this I would agree 100% with your site's content.

I also wanted to state (though most in your Congregation know that this is the case) that there is no such thing as "Christian Scriptures" as all books in Scripture are Jewish.
Even certain Apocryphal books used are Jewish books.
The Christians merely adopted our books for use in their religion.

bethaderech

‍‍February 21st, 2013 - 22 Shevat 5773 at 8:51 pm    

seeker

Well said,

Leave a reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Contact us via Twitter
Read our RSS Feeds
Follow us via Facebook
Call us via Skype
Send us an email